 |
Reading
Room
Article Summary
Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia:
What is the effect of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis?
Flaherty KR, King TE, Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2004;170:904-910.
Discussion
- The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis represents a
distinct clinical challenge and requires a careful and thorough
assessment of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings. Accordingly,
the current ATS/ERS Consensus Statement recommends an integrated
diagnostic approach that is characterized by close and ongoing
collaboration between clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists.1
- While the value of multidisciplinary collaboration seems intuitive,
the effect of such an approach on the ultimate diagnosis has not
been previously assessed. In the current study, Flaherty, et al,
sought to quantify the impact of sequential increases in multidisciplinary
interaction on the final diagnosis and the level of diagnostic
confidence for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.
Study Design
- Participants included 3 expert clinicians, 2 expert radiologists,
and 2 expert pathologists, all from university hospitals After
independently reviewing the HRCTs of 58 suspected cases of idiopathic
interstitial pneumonia, clinicians and radiologists were first
asked to provide their initial diagnosis and level of diagnostic
confidence (Step 1).
- Clinical information was then provided for each case, and participants
were asked to repeat their selections of the most likely diagnosis
and indicate the level of diagnostic confidence (Step 2). Clinicians
and radiologists were then permitted to discuss the clinical and
radiologic findings and asked to once again record their individual
diagnosis and confidence level (Step 3).
- Pathologists in the following stage provided their interpretation
of the surgical lung biopsies. Following a group discussion of
the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings, individual
diagnoses and level of confidence from clinicians, radiologists,
and pathologists were recorded (Step 4). Finally, group discussion
of cases followed in an attempt to reach a consensus diagnosis
for each patient; consensus diagnoses could not be reached in
all cases so participants again recorded their individual diagnoses
and level of confidence (Step 5).
Results/Discussion:
- Investigators observed a significant correlation between multidisciplinary
interaction, ie, discussion of cases among clinicians, radiologists,
and pathologists, and diagnostic agreement and level of confidence
- The greatest change in diagnosis occurred among radiologists
after pathologists provided interpretations of the biopsies
- The greatest improvement in diagnostic agreement among clinicians
occurred after discussing clinical and HRCT features with radiologists
- A change in the final diagnosis was particularly likely to occur
for patients with atypical clinical or radiologic findings
- Providing clinical and radiologic information to pathologists
resulted in an alternative diagnosis in 19% of cases
- A limitation of the study was the use of participants with significant
expertise in the field of interstitial lung disease who may not
be accessible to practicing community pulmonologists
Implications/Recommendations:
- Whenever possible, clinicians should review the actual HRCT
with radiologists instead of relying on reported findings
- A surgical lung biopsy may not be necessary when the clinical
and radiologic findings are consistent with a confident diagnosis
of IPF
- Atypical clinical or radiologic findings should prompt the clinician
to consider a surgical lung biopsy, since reaching a consensus
diagnosis is most influenced by the histopathologic pattern
- Flexibility and cooperation among clinicians, radiologists,
and pathologists are key factors for arriving at a consensus diagnosis
in patients with interstitial lung disease
Reference
- American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. American
Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary
consensus classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277-304.
Article link
Click
here for a direct link to the article abstract
|
|